Who is tito jackson dating
It’s reaching so far, it’s over-analyzing it to the point that I don’t know what to do with that.
Jackson waited to see what he could get away with before progressing to the next level of intimacy. Why Wade would ruin his career by claiming abuse from Jackson is unfathomable, and no amount of money would be sufficient to cover the shame and embarrassment of admitting to (or even lying about) being sodomized by a celebrity such as Jackson.The first, and most explosive of course, was the realisation by Wade Robson that all that “love” that Jackson showed to him over seven years, when Wade was aged seven to fourteen years, was in fact sexual molestation.While still to be decided in the courts, Wade Robson’s claim is shocking in which it details the level of abuse suffered at the hands of Jackson. To most, it would be surprising that sodomy is being alleged because we have never heard this claimed about Jackson before, but upon reflection it is not surprising at all.To most people, there has been so much evidence now of Jackson’s predilection for young boys, it beggars belief that some rational, thoughtful people are still on the fence regarding his guilt.Even though we know that Jackson entertained different boys for at least 850 or more nights, owned books featuring photos of naked young boys, and paid a lot of money to boys who accused him of molestation, once we take into account the Halo Effect, it is easy for some to have residual doubts about whether Jackson is guilty or not.In any case, Mario Nitrini met Aphrodite and has this to say: ” … We have shown that Aphrodite can speak out of both sides of her mouth, and she displayed that brilliantly in an interview with Jordan King on November 5th. In that huddle of overly enthusiastic Jackson fandom, anything, absolutely anything which casts even a sliver of doubt upon Jackson’s motives with children is met with howls of outrage and shuddering feelings of anger.
At a dinner house in March of 2006 on Ventura Blvd and Coldwater Canyon Blvd here in The San Fernando Valley, Aphrodite Jones told me POINT-BLANK, and emphatically stated that Michael Jackson was GUILTY of child molestation. After reiterating the unfairness of the 2005 trial, she made this extraordinary admission about the 1993 Chandler case: Do I have doubts about the innocence in 1993? That it came from Aphrodite Jones added an extra sting to the slap, and MJ fans were left bewildered and confused. None of us I don’t think will ever know what happened.
Not to be deterred, Liz Hayes presses on: “As a friend, someone that was his closest friend, I would have expected you to say “absolutely not”.” “Well, sometimes expectations are not always satisfied,” Murray continues.
“One thing I will tell you is this: I may have formed an impression of an individual based upon certain things I have seen or encountered.” Ms Hayes was not going to be put off, after all, this is someone who knows Jackson very well and she doesn’t want this question left hanging.
Aphrodite went on to say “[June’s testimony] is a HUGE reason…. I sat inches away, feet away from Jordy Chandler’s mother and watched her testify for hours and hours and everything about her made me feel like she was a woman who was looking the other way. But I’m not willing to say he didn’t do that nor that I feel he did because I don’t know, but I will say I was shaken by June Chandler’s testimony.” “I’m not here to debate what happened in 1993. I think that will die with Jordy and his father who killed himself and the rest of that family, who do or do not know anything.
Everything about what she said.” “Now, does that mean that I think that Michael really did anything? I don’t know.” So we have someone who is absolutely viewed as being in the Jackson defender camp expressing quite reasonable doubts about the innocence of Jackson in the case of Jordan Chandler.
” Murray is measured in his response: “I’ll never be unfair to Michael and I’m not here to destroy Michael.