skip to content »

Us free sexy text chatroom

Us free sexy text chatroom-70

If he relies on these means of communicating, you will build sandcastles in the sky because really, when you spend your time reading into things, you can make it any relationship that you want!

Us free sexy text chatroom-70

It started with the smiley face and the gloomy face and now there are 16 pages of them in the texters' A-Z. It is interesting, in a masochistic sort of way, to look at how text language has changed over the years.When a man relies primarily on text messaging, instant messenger, and email for communicating with you, it’s not because he’s a new age man, it’s not because the written word is his tool, and it’s not because he is trying to manage his time effectively. He is using ‘new’ forms of communication to control you and how often you both correspond so that he can control the relationship.He wants to keep at a distance, and it’s likely that he’s emotionally unavailable, an assclown, or both. When a man is too lazy to communicate with you properly, why waste the air you breathe on him?It has removed the hyphen from no fewer than 16,000 words. The spell-check (sorry: spellcheck) on my computer is happy with both. There are fewer letters in that hideous word and think how much time I could have saved typing it.) The texters also have economy on their side.So in future we are required to spell pigeon-hole, for instance, as pigeonhole and leap-frog as leapfrog. But that's not why I feel betrayed by my precious OED. It has happened because we are changing the way we communicate with each other, which means, says the OED editor Angus Stevenson, that we no longer have time to reach for the hyphen key. No time to make one tiny key-stroke (sorry: key stroke). Are our lives really so pressured, every minute occupied in so many vital tasks, every second accounted for, that we cannot afford the millisecond (no hyphen) it takes to tap that key? No, there's another reason - and it's far more sinister and deeply troubling. It costs almost nothing to send a text message compared with a voice message. I must also concede that some voice messages can be profoundly irritating.So in summary, if he doesn’t progress from these forms of communication – it’s a danger signal, period.

If you spend a lot of time trying to figure out what he meant by his latest ‘message’, it means you’re not communicating directly and I would also take this as a mega warning signal.

I often get asked what the danger signals are with men and I point out the key ones in my post on red flags (print and keep if you are drawn to assclowns) and how to spot emotionally unavailable men (print out and keep if you tend to be drawn to the emotionally stunted), but that doesn’t stop many readers from looking for loopholes and making excuses.

One of the danger zones is about how your man communicates with you: Let me be clear.

It is the relentless onward march of the texters, the SMS (Short Message Service) vandals who are doing to our language what Genghis Khan did to his neighbours eight hundred years ago. The texters have many more arrows in their quiver than we who defend the old way. My own outgoing message asks callers to be very brief - ideally just name and number - but that doesn't stop some callers burbling on for ten minutes and always, always ending by saying: "Ooh - sorry I went on so long!

They are destroying it: pillaging our punctuation; savaging our sentences; raping our vocabulary. " But can that be any more irritating than those absurd little smiley faces with which texters litter their messages?

Wondering if he has a wife or girlfriend stashed away?