skip to content »

Reliability radioactive carbon dating

In the same way, by identifying fossils, he may have related Sedimentary Rocks B with some other rocks.Creationists would generally agree with the above methods and use them in their geological work.

reliability radioactive carbon dating-41reliability radioactive carbon dating-34reliability radioactive carbon dating-19

The field relationships, as they are called, are of primary importance and all radiometric dates are evaluated against them.From the mapped field relationships, it is a simple matter to work out a geological cross-section and the relative timing of the geologic events.His geological cross-section may look something like Figure 2.Let us imagine that the date reported by the lab was 150.7 ± 2.8 million years.Our geologist would be very happy with this result.It is clear that the sedimentary rock was deposited and folded before the dyke was squeezed into place.

By looking at other outcrops in the area, our geologist is able to draw a geological map which records how the rocks are related to each other in the field.

In other words, the age should lie between 197.2 million years and 203.6 million years.

However, this error is not the real error on the date.

In fact, he would have been equally happy with any date a bit less than 200 million years or a bit more than 30 million years.

They would all have fitted nicely into the field relationships that he had observed and his interpretation of them.

The field relationships are generally broad, and a wide range of ‘dates’ can be interpreted as the time when the lava solidified.