skip to content »

Is radiometric dating flaws

is radiometric dating flaws-41

Clearly, the calculated ages are useless for dating any event.

is radiometric dating flaws-61is radiometric dating flaws-72is radiometric dating flaws-74

This means that the laboratory testing was precise.Clearly visible in the walls of the Inner Gorge are spectacular light-coloured rocks, such as the pink granites,1 which stand out starkly against the darker, metamorphic rocks2 (figures 1 and 2).The latter are former sedimentary and volcanic layers that have been transformed (metamorphosed) by heat and pressure during intense geologic upheavals in the past.The isotopic results other than potassium-argon (K-Ar), namely rubidium-strontium (Rb-Sr), samarium-neodymium (Sm-Nd) and lead-lead (Pb-Pb), were used to calculate ages for the rock formation utilizing isochrons.Three ages altogether were obtained, one for each isotopic system.That is a six-fold difference, for samples that should be of similar age.

Note that the error estimates (the ± numbers) are small compared with the age.

Some outcrops reveal round pillow structures, showing that the basalt lavas erupted under water.

Based on radiometric dating, long-age geologists say that the basalt lavas erupted 1,745 million years ago4 and were metamorphosed some 1,700 million years ago.5 Many people, including many scientists, accept these dates as absolute truth.

The results are not even close to each other, although the samples should all have given the same age.

Furthermore, the ages calculated for these Grand Canyon rocks using three “isochron” methods also disagreed greatly with each other.

However, as the results show, the error estimates say nothing about the accuracy of the “ages” of the rock samples.