Ethics of doctors dating patients
It must be remembered that the principle of nonmaleficence and its specifications in moral rules are prima facie and not absolute.
The principles of nonmaleficence supports several moral rules, with examples here including:of harm.It must never be assumed that because a patient is part of a particular culture or community, they affirm that community's values and beliefs.Respect for autonomy is not a mere ideal in healthcare - it is a professional obligation.Countries that lack a comprehensive and coherent healthcare system typically have larger numbers of unprotected citizens and therefore need to improve both utility (efficiency) and justice (fairness and equality).This is further complicated by the fact that the construction of a unified theory of justice that captures our diverse conceptions and use of principles of justice in biomedical ethics remains controversial and hard to pin down.Ideals and the Hippocratic Oath have been covered in a separate article but it is worth repeating the summary of the Oath here: It is no longer enough simply to treat the patient as you would wish to be treated yourself.
Follow such a tenet blindly and you could well find yourself on the wrong side of the law.
Medical and social ethics have advanced to an extent that doctors are likely to be faced with controversial issues on a regular basis.
Euthanasia, information sharing and the use of human tissues are typical examples.
Caring for patients as individuals also means leaving one's prejudice at the surgery door.
Patients should be provided with the best possible care irrespective of age, sexuality, ethnicity, religious beliefs or politics. Whatever the clinician's view of smoking, obesity and drug dependency, it is his or her ethical duty to be supportive, not judgemental.
Patient welfare embodies medicine's goal, justification and rationale - examples here include public health, preventative medicine and biomedical research.