Empleadas y patrones documental online dating
The profile was listed under the identifier “Chase529.” Carafano is a popular actress.Under the stage name of Chase Masterson, Carafano has appeared in numerous films and television shows, such as “Star Trek: Deep Space Nine,” and “General Hospital.” Pictures of the actress are widely available on the Internet, and the false Matchmaker profile “Chase529” contained several of these pictures.
(New members were permitted to post “trial” profiles for a few weeks without paying.) The posting was without the knowledge, consent or permission of Carafano.Along with fairly innocuous responses to questions about interests and appearance, the person posting the profile selected “Playboy/Playgirl” for “main source of current events” and “looking for a one-night stand” for “why did you call.” In addition, the open-ended essay responses indicated that “Chase529” was looking for a “hard and dominant” man with “a strong sexual appetite” and that she “liked sort of be [ ]ing controlled by a man, in and out of bed.” The profile text did not include a last name for “Chase” or indicate Carafano’s real name, but it listed two of her movies (and, as mentioned, included pictures of the actress).In response to a question about the “part of the LA area” in which she lived, the profile provided Carafano’s home address.This is a case involving a cruel and sadistic identity theft. A typical profile contains one or more pictures of the subject, descriptive information such as age, appearance and interests, and answers to a variety of questions designed to evoke the subject’s personality and reason for joining the service.In this appeal, we consider to what extent a computer match making service may be legally responsible for false content in a dating profile provided by someone posing as another person. Members are required to complete a detailed questionnaire containing both multiple-choice and essay questions.Baker, Steptoe & Johnson, Washington, DC, were also on the brief.
Deborah Pierce and Linda Ackerman, Privacyactivism, San Francisco, California, for amici curiae The American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA), Gavin De Becker, Privacyactivism, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, and the Screen Actors Guild (SAG). For a fee, members of Matchmaker post anonymous profiles and may then view profiles of other members in their area, contacting them via electronic mail sent through the Matchmaker server.
Under the circumstances presented by this case, we conclude that the service is statutorily immune pursuant to 47 U. In the initial portion of the questionnaire, members select answers to more than fifty questions from menus providing between four and nineteen options.
Some of the potential multiple choice answers are innocuous; some are sexually suggestive.
The district court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment in a published opinion. Congress considered the weight of the speech interests implicated and chose to immunize service providers to avoid any such restrictive effect.
Zeran, 129 F.3d at 330-31 (citation omitted); see also Batzel, 333 F.3d at 1027 (quoting Zeran with approval).
Alarmed, she contacted the police the following day. We recently considered whether § 230(c) provided immunity to the operator of an electronic newsletter who selected and published an allegedly defamatory e-mail over the Internet. We held that the online newsletter qualified as an “interactive computer service” under the statutory definition and that the selection for publication and editing of an e-mail did not constitute partial “creation or development” of that information within the definition of “information content provider.” Although the case was ultimately remanded for determination of whether the original author intended to “provide” his e-mail for publication, id.